houserichichi wrote:You'd think that true scientists would keep their options open and remain agnostic. I don't know who voted for what (I have yet to vote, myself), but I'm surprised by more atheistic votes than agnostic. Sure, there a bunch of philosophies that discourage the need or use of a god in our way of thought but true science can never rule an argument out unless there is theoretical or experimental proof against. As there is neither (there is philosophical in the form of Occam's razor, for one, but that's not science) you'd think that the scienceheads would be forced agnostic (choice: Maybe). Maybe there is a god. Maybe he's in 4d. There's no proof of either. There's no disproof of either. Maybe maybe maybe?
moonlord wrote:I consider God to be the one who takes care for the laws of physics to be valid. Therefore, God is not material, nor related to space or time. It's just the Architect.
moonlord wrote:In other words, my belief is that God IS the Universe.
In other words, my belief is that God IS the Universe.
As we currently possess no scientific proof as to whether God does or does not exist, I prefer to remain undecided.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests