Tetronia wrote:Um, I was thinking, and I've found that there is a flaw in the Big Bang theory, which makes it a farce.
The Big Bang theory says that, out of nowhere, a speck smaller than a quark appeared. It got larger and larger-- then it exploded. When it exploded, space and time came into existence and were shot in all directions, and became our universe.
However, if time did not exist before the explosion, how could the spack appear and grow? It couldn't if time was not passing. Therefore, the Big Bang theory is a farce.
Comments? Questions? Waffles?
Tetronia wrote:^Because if time started at the instant of the explosion, then there would be no passing time to allow the ball to grow and explode first.
Tetronia wrote:^Yes, it does. The theory says that the ball appeared out of nowhere and began to grow. When it became about the size of a decillion suns, it exploded. If time started at the instant of the explosion, then how could the ball have appeared and growm to the size of a decillion suns? It's fairly easy to conceptualize.
Exilon wrote:But in order for the spec to explode at t=0 then surely there must have been multiple variables that had caused the existance of this spec in the first place, which therefore would mean that t=0 isn't actually the start of time,
Exilon wrote:also if the universe exploded and all that we see around us today was once stored in an infinitesimally small spec, surely the density and gravitational forces acting upon that object would have been so large that it would have collapsed upon itself? Although that's theory because those kind of variables can never be recreated.
most believe it is the remainder of an older, failed universe that collapsed in on itself and was compressed down to a dot less than a billionth the size of a proton
Finally, it's natural but incorrect to picture the singularity as a tiny dot floating in a black or white void...there was nothing outside it. It was zero-dimensional.
blupigan wrote:the big bang theory isnt a complete farce, it just tries to explain too much. when we try to explain the CREATION of the universe we are trying the impossible. how can there be a creation of everything? there cant be. everything has to have been here an infinitely long amount of time because for something to be created it has to come from something.
blupigan wrote:matter cannot be created or destroyed.
blupigan wrote:to say that the universe was created at any point is to watch a glass and wait for it to fill up with water on its own. here's is my theory, which after much deliberation i hold true.
blupigan wrote:the big bang does and did happen, when all matter in the universe gravitates towards everything else there is a big ball, and the weight of that ball on the fabric of space time is so great, it squeezes and squeezes until it is as squeezed as it possible can be, and when all the matter that is pushing on the fabric of space time is all in one spot, the weight of this object would be the weight of everything, and if everything is in one spot then eveyrthing must be pulled to it, including the fabric of the unvierse. the universe collapses in on itself, once the fabric of the universe encompasses this super compressed ball it opens back up again, pulling everything out with it. this happens an infinite amount of times for an infinitely long time.
blupigan wrote:its the universe, its everything. it cant be created. it has always been and always will.
blupigan wrote:because if the universe was "created" where would it be created, it would have to have a point of creation, and if there is nothing then there is nowhere to place this point of creation.
blupigan wrote:now im not saying im right, im saying thats what i think and thats what believe, if anyone can de-bunk that then please do, i love to be corrected. without correction i cant learn, and thats what we're here to do.
by the way i use the quantum loop theory in my thinkings since that makes the most sense to me.
Return to Where Should I Post This?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest