thigle wrote:but accords with experience, which ain't purely causal.
acausality is actually so ubiquitous that noone seems to care to even notice.
why is it that people want to stick with causality so much ? is the habit of perpetuating habits stronger than desire for freedom & truth ? for how long ?
actually, once people realize that physus is just a dual of logos, both of which are bifurcation from peiron (finite, bounded), which itself is dual to apeiron (unbound, infinite), we will step out of reductionist frame, right here into the Open.
causal order floats over acausal. the ordered is ordered by ordering which ain't fully causal.
so why is it called 'violation' of causality ? due to the habit of causal mind (or more broadly due to the deeply rooted dualizing tendency of our Western Indo-European tradition) which tends to dualize and see this duality as a conflict, instead of understanding polarities as COMPLEMENTARY.
if you check our mythologies, you gonna find countless images of 'defeating the Dragon', which ain't nothing other than repression/killing of the 'Wild' by masculine logocentric rationality.
thigle wrote:general relativity being the best we have for macroscopic scale and QM best we have for the microscopic scale, still we have not the good theory under/over the micro/micro scales, nor for the life-scale in between.
these 2 are just extreme theories. beautiful indeed, but oh so incomplete.
thigle wrote:this complexity of consciousness/life/social organisation right here before us, on this very SpaceshipEarth, stays without fitting any 'scientific' explanation yet. maybe the warmth it glows is too much for the cold bitches.
thigle wrote:it's unnecessary to keep sciences distinct, and even more unnecessary to hold theories within sciences strictly distinct. they are in constant touch from within anyway, and they fuse gradually anyway, and thus old theories/'sciences' die periodically and 'new' ones emerge.
not all sciences are cold bitches.
I think that sooner or later we will be able to travel as fast/faster than the speed of light. You say that it takes infinity amount of energy to reach that speed, but then how does light waves do it?
moonlord wrote:So, I should gather P is wrong. Right? Left?
Return to Non-Spatial Dimensions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests