## Rotational dimensions and directions

If you don't know where to post something, put it here and an administrator or moderator will move it to the right place.

### Rotational dimensions and directions

I know that when an object is spinning horizontally so that the top and bottom and ana and kata sides are stationary than it is said to either be spinning clockwise or counter clockwise. But what about the other rotational directions such as when an object is spinning so that its top and bottom and left and right side are stationary or when its left and right and ana kata sides are stationary and so on? What are the names of these rotational directions and what are the names of all the rotational dimensions. What are the names of all the rotational directions?
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
anderscolingustafson
Tetronian

Posts: 315
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:39 pm

### Re: Rotational dimensions and directions

Actually clockwise and anticlockwise (or counter-clockwise) are entirely dependent on the perspective; you screw a screw in clockwise, but if you're looking from the other side (usually you wouldn't, because there'd be something in the way, but say you're screwing something on the other side of a wall by feeling it) then you screw it anticlockwise.

In other words, there is no such thing as clockwise or anticlockwise if you only have a plane to determine where the rotation is happening: you also need to know the positive directions of the plane, and then you can say that if you look at the plane such that the x-axis points right and the y-axis points up, you know which way a clockwise rotation goes.

Keiji

Posts: 1969
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Torquay, England

### Re: Rotational dimensions and directions

Didn't we have names for an extension of yaw, pitch and roll?

PWrong
Pentonian

Posts: 1599
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2004 8:21 am
Location: Perth, Australia

### Re: Rotational dimensions and directions

The notion of clockwise and anti-clockwise becomes meaningless in 4D.
People may consider as God the beings of finite higher dimensions,
though in truth, God has infinite dimensions

Prashantkrishnan
Trionian

Posts: 114
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 5:37 pm
Location: Kochi, Kerala, India

### Re: Rotational dimensions and directions

In 4d, you still have parity of rotation. These are the clifford left and clifford right.

You must remember that ampere's law applies in all dimensions.
The dream you dream alone is only a dream
the dream we dream together is reality.

\ ( \(\LaTeX\ \) \ ) [no spaces] at https://greasyfork.org/en/users/188714-wendy-krieger

wendy
Pentonian

Posts: 1987
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 12:42 pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

### Re: Rotational dimensions and directions

wendy wrote:In 4d, you still have parity of rotation. These are the clifford left and clifford right.

You must remember that ampere's law applies in all dimensions.

When the number of dimensions is more than 3, how do we find the net current crossing a closed loop? In 3D we subtract currents in opposite directions, but in 4D, the current can enter the loop at various angles. And what happens to the right hand thumb rule?
People may consider as God the beings of finite higher dimensions,
though in truth, God has infinite dimensions

Prashantkrishnan
Trionian

Posts: 114
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 5:37 pm
Location: Kochi, Kerala, India

### Re: Rotational dimensions and directions

Also, what would be the nature of magnetic field in 4D? Obviously Biot-Savart law as we know in 3D cannot hold. What would be its form in 4D?
People may consider as God the beings of finite higher dimensions,
though in truth, God has infinite dimensions

Prashantkrishnan
Trionian

Posts: 114
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 5:37 pm
Location: Kochi, Kerala, India

### Re: Rotational dimensions and directions

The general form of the ampere law in higher dimensions does not suppose current, but 'circulation'.

A ring here is a division-boundary on a solid, such as the outline of a section against one axis. But the division does not have to be coplanar. Such a ring, when spanned by a surface (N-1 space), gives rise to a 'vector area', which is independent of the shape of the surface. This is the general reflex of the rule m = IA (magnetic moment = current * area).

This means that the ring has a parity, in the form of a circulation, (I), which gives a sense of direction to A (ie the normals to A, which are added vectorially, acquire their sense from the perimeter). As with the ordinary partition of the area into a mesh, and each little mesh-cell has the same I and sense, this replicates in every dimension.
The dream you dream alone is only a dream
the dream we dream together is reality.

\ ( \(\LaTeX\ \) \ ) [no spaces] at https://greasyfork.org/en/users/188714-wendy-krieger

wendy
Pentonian

Posts: 1987
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 12:42 pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Return to Where Should I Post This?

### Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest