The following link to the first tweet to read, is the Abstract (1 page), which tells the information that can be found throughout the literature :

https://twitter.com/4DGeometry/status/9 ... 2789856256

The following link to the second tweet is the revised introduction (page 1 of 2), 1.1 'Dimension' defined as "economical structure" :

https://twitter.com/4DGeometry/status/9 ... 4202328064

The following link to the third tweet is page 2 of 2 of the revised introduction, 1.2 'Dimension' defined as "independent direction of motion" :

https://twitter.com/4DGeometry/status/9 ... 1527744512

The last link is the full Tweets page on twitter, whereas the full original 150-paged literature begins at tweet 6 and continues throughout that scroll down page. The tweet titled "Pages 05-08" can be skipped, as the new introduction defining 'dimension' covers what those 4 pages originally began to discuss. This is due to the fact that the literature as laidout, is delivered in the order I actually figured out the 4-dimensional geometry in.

One final definition of 'dimension' should be divulged at this point, thus : "as a pure mathematically abstract construct." This is a third way to understand the 4d geometry delivered, as merely an extension of the first 3 dimensions and the 3-dimensional perspective of the 4d geometry, as can be google searched online. This last definition, only allows one to understand the 4d geometry delivered, but holds no property of how nature can apply higher dimensional geometries while nature appears 3-dimensional to us. The first 2 definitions show how nature can hide potential higher dimensional geometries, right in front of our faces. Enjoy...

https://twitter.com/4DGeometry