![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/grin.gif)
I like to wonder about the possibilities of another dimension alltogether as much as anyone in this forum, but thinking sensibly, it can't really be.
whiteonriceboy wrote:but why can we assume that there is a tetraspace at all?
pat wrote:There are countless (well, technically "countable") things in mathematics and physics which could be better visualized if we were more fluent with higher-dimensional spaces.
pat wrote:As for integrating with complex variables, I think you're going to run into problems with the expression | z<sup>2</sup> + z | = 4 because the absolute value sign brings in a discontinuity. But, I'll think about it some more.
pat wrote:From the sounds of what you have above, you're integrating/differentiating as if it were two functions of two real variables. Integrating/differentiating as complex numbers isn't quite the same.
trill wrote:like many things in science, this is theoretically possible but we do not know if it is true until it is proved--even if possibly there is no known way to prove it.
PWrong wrote:Hi everyone, I'm back. The mocks went well.![]()
Don't mind me saying this, but what are you three on about?(mghtymoop, trill and RQ)
About my mandelbrot set problem, I've discovered it might not be possible. I didn't realise there were some functions that don't have an integral at all. I think the mandelbrot lemniscates are probably like them. So much for finding the area.
I'm working on a new ridiculously difficult project now, which I might describe in another post later. It's about the "tetration" function, that came up a few threads ago.
Return to Higher Spatial Dimensions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest