by Sideshow » Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:46 pm
I haven't read the book, but I know what the theories are in Flatland. I think the version of a two-dimensional world portrayed on this website is more accurate, with planets forming as large circles in two-dimensional space. That would be if they had gravity in a form we recognize, however. Maybe gravity is a universal constant, as some scientists have theorized that the reason gravity is so weak in this universe is because it's leeching out to other universes. That's another discussion, however.
As to what life would look like in these dimensions, I think it would be a good idea to define what life is first, and then work from there. In general terms, something is considered alive only when it exhibits the following characteristics:
1. It maintains homeostasis
2. It metabolizes energy and converts it to other forms
3. It grows over time
4. It adapts to its environment
5. It is organized on some physical level (i.e. has cells)
6. It responds to stimuli
7. It reproduces
These are all acceptable in three dimensional terms, where the physics of energy are well known. However, #5 may be different as the physics would be different, and numbers 1 and 2, while reasonable, may not be applicable in other dimensions where the physics may be different. Using this template, though, with given variables in mind, it may be possible to theorize other forms of life unlike the ones we're accustomed to.