Gilles wrote:Hello everyone
Since you're all so confused about the universe, and I actualy understand what Einstein had to say, i got a nice one to think about for you here.
As you know, approaching the speed of light, increases our mass, and decreases time. It's logic, cos mas goes slowly (1st law of newton).
Gilles wrote:Clocks will tick slowlier if they have a higher mass, and so will every biolological process lose speed.
Gilles wrote:Our consience, being 5-dimensional mass, will do it aswell.
Gilles wrote:If time inside us goes slower, but it stays the same outside, it means that we go faster (!). It's not that hard to see, is it?
Gilles wrote:Light, actualy has an unlimited speed, but, close to mass, it goes slower than far away from mass.
Gilles wrote:Seen from our earth, someone going faster then the speed of light, would go with the speed of light.
Gilles wrote:Going much faster than that speed, would make it useless to return to earth, cos earth wouldn't exist anymore, once you came back, to much time would have passed.
Gilles wrote:Don't try to catch up with time, though, that would reverse the biochemical processes in your body, and you wouldn't remember that you've been in the future. That means it doesn't make sense to do it, and that it might happen every moment of our life.
Travelling in time, would bring your conscience to an altered state, where you don't remember you actualy did it, so it makes no sense.
Gilles wrote:By the way, the fourth dimension is just evolution, and if you want to draw a 4-d cube, draw a cube within a cube, and connect all the cornes, so that every corner spits out 4 lines.
Gilles wrote:Mathematicians, check that last thing, it's true according to the number of lines(32) , corners(16) and surfaces(24) needed for such a figure. The growth from the smaller to teh bigger cube, is the 4th dimension.
Gilles wrote:By the way, if any one of you wan't to know the truth, it's inside yourself, and only there...
If I didn't write that it depends on who's watching all the time, it doesn't mean I don't see that, that's just the obvious thing of the whole theory.
You do it by a mathematic way, i do it in a metafysical way. I see no problem in that.
The only thing I can tell you about mathematics, is that it's a language used by mankind, which is understood by just a fraction of those who use it
The process of evolution, wich i state to be the 4th dimension, is just an abstract figure to you. I try to combine both the abstract figure, and the process.
I think mankind can't get further by thinking in maths, time is comming for us to actualy understand this
Gilles wrote:What I didn't realy make clear in my last text, is that even the speed of light itself depends on the observer. Therefore, it's possible to travel faster then 300 000 km/s, but, as you stated it, not faster then the speed of light.
Gilles wrote:How about someone traveling with 0.99 times the speed of light?
An outside observer, would not see you reach the speed of light, but you'd go a lot faster then what he calls 300 000 km/s
Am I right?
jinydu wrote:Gilles wrote:How about someone traveling with 0.99 times the speed of light?
An outside observer, would not see you reach the speed of light, but you'd go a lot faster then what he calls 300 000 km/s
Am I right?
No, an outside observer would claim that you are moving at 0.99 * 300 000 km/s = 297 000 km/s
Gilles wrote:A Maxwell's equations are to difficult for me to understand, you leave me with the fact that light speed is a constant thing, whereas space and time are variables.
Am I correct here?
Now I wonder, if the speed of light is 300 000km/s for every obeserver, what would light speed be for someone traveling with half of the speed of light?
300 000 km/s, no?
How about someone traveling with 0.99 times the speed of light?
I think we agree on the fact that it's still 300 000km/s. That means that even if you travel close to the speed of light, you're still far away from is, and you still have lots of ways left to try and get closer to it, but you won't.
An outside observer, would not see you reach the speed of light, but you'd go a lot faster then what he calls 300 000 km/s
Am I right?
Gilles wrote:Nice hypothesis,
Don't you guys think it a bit to coincidential that nowaday scientists talk about the Aether, while buddhists have spoken about Prana for years, and the New Age movement adores the Universal Energy? Plato mentioned it aswell.
Use it, guys, it's good for you.
Gilles wrote:I don't really remember having read about a nicholson-morley experiment.
What I do know, is that it's hard to disprove the Aether, of whatever name you want to give to it, simply because it exists to some people, and they work with it. As for myself, I see it with my very eyes, and because of a lack of better, i trust what I see.
Ok cya
If there is an Aether, there is no objective way of determining that it exists, in which case, science is not interested in it.
Gilles wrote:If there is an Aether, there is no objective way of determining that it exists, in which case, science is not interested in it.
Yes I know, and that's a pity, but saying it's been disproven is a bit radical. It's not been proven, cos time for that just wasen't ready yet, but trust me, that'll come.
jinydu wrote:As someone who has studied some Relativity, I can see several flaws in your logic.
<snip>
Gilles wrote:Our consience, being 5-dimensional mass, will do it aswell.
Jinydu wrote:Relativity is a theory that aims to describe the physical universe. It has nothing to do with consciousness in a spiritual sense, and certainly doesn't claim that it is a 5-dimensional mass.
jinydu wrote:Some children have claimed that Santa Claus is real, and that one day, the whole world will see the proof. We're still waiting... :wink:
Return to Non-Spatial Dimensions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests