alkaline wrote:3. using the 4d table of elements, generate 4d chemistry
alkaline wrote:1. Calculate 4d quantum physics
alkaline wrote:It sounds like you were calculating classical orbits, like that of planets or something. I don't think electrons orbit nuclei classicly - i think they actually form a standing wave around the nucleus. We only picture them as point-orbiting because it's easier to think of them that way. So what exactly does your solution of using a ring for an electron mean? would it be a ring that encircled the entire nucleus? if so, it wouldn't have an easy time swapping back and forth to other nuclei, and it wouldn't give the properties of electricity that 3d electrons do.
bobxp wrote:alkaline wrote:1. Calculate 4d quantum physics
And how do you plan on doing that?
Polyhedron Dude wrote:They would be circle (or springy circle) shaped rings that go around the nucleus, they would also form a standing wave around the nucleus due to quantum effects - the ring would be the particle form of the electron, the standing wave would be the wave form - how this ring version would effect electricity - I have no idea - haven't really dug into quantum mechanics that much.
alkaline wrote:so by "go around the nucleus", do you mean encircle the nucleus like a ring of saturn? Would the size of this ring be bigger than the nucleus itself? that would mean it would have a big hollow area in the middle of it, and it seems like it would have a lot more mass that way than our 3d electrons do.
Return to Higher Spatial Dimensions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests