QM( duality paradox )
GR( spooky action at a distance )
SR( constant EMRadiation speed )
Not that I have those associations correct but a sense of some weird/odd if not absurb observations by us.
I wish I had the computing power, and graphic abilities to run the various possible scenarios I envision with the 5/phi-fold icosa(20)hedron and the 4-fold VE/cubo-octa(8)hedron.
1)....OIO ...In the simplest scenario our finite Universe eternally exists as the space where there is only two spherical/spheroidal icosahedrals-- left and right skew --- overlapping. This creates the oblong shape like in two circles partially overlapping, with a potentialyl flat plane that is contains both all of the information of the 4-fold VE/cubo-octahedron in one of its equilateral surface triangles, and
all of the information on one of the left-skew icosahedrals equilateral triangles, and
all of the information on one of the right-skew icosahedrals equiliateral triangles.
In simplest version #1 above, the flat plane is an eternal constant, i.e. it never unfolds/expands outward as the fullblown VE/cubo-octahedron.
In the most complex Rybonic scenario;
Version #2..) OIO.....I envision the exact same shaped scenario as above, except that there can be as many as 8 left-skew and 8 right-skew on both sides of the octa-bonded/valenced , 4-fold flat plane.
In this scenario, the 4-fold plane unfolds to become a full-blown VE/cubo-octahedron with 8 external icosahedrals, each one face bonded to one of the VE's equlaterally triangles, and,
8 internal icosahedrals, with each bonded/valenced to the same 8 equlateral triangles.
This latter scenario creates a situation where the VE/cubo-octahedron has 8, 5/phi-fold icosahedrals intermingly/interfering in complex ways within the VE/cubo-octahedron.
To see this one in operation would take some complex computing abilities. imho
We would start with a simpler Euclidean computations of the above, then progress to the sphericals and then to most complex scenario.
http://phys.org/news/2012-08-spacetime- ... tml#inlRlv
"Gamma-ray bursts can tell us some very interesting things about the universe," Nemiroff said. In this case, those three photons recorded by the Fermi telescope suggest that spacetime may not be not as bubbly as some scientists think. Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2012-08-spacetime- ... w.html#jCp
Ultra-micro, quasi-physical, gravitational spacetime is further beyond our abilities to detect, indirectly or directly at this time, If not eternally beyond our abilities to detect.
To quantify or not quantize that is not the question, as we will never quantize gravitational spacetime.
See also Fermi bubbles to find similar cosmological shapes of space, as follows
http://www.astronomynow.com/news/n1011/11fermi/